[1]王玲姝,罗 雪,杨 光.穴位埋线联合脂肪扫散法治疗单纯性肥胖临床研究[J].陕西中医,2019,(3):390-393.
　WANG Lingshu,LUO Xue,YANG Guang..Clinical observation of acupoint thread embedding plus fat sweep method for simple obesity[J].,2019,(3):390-393.
点击复制

穴位埋线联合脂肪扫散法治疗单纯性肥胖临床研究
分享到：

《陕西中医》[ISSN:1000-7369/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年3
页码:
390-393
栏目:
针灸经络
出版日期:
2019-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical observation of acupoint thread embedding plus fat sweep method for simple obesity
文章编号:
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10007369.2019.03.035
作者:
王玲姝1; 罗 雪2; 杨 光1
1.黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院（哈尔滨 150040）;2.黑龙江中医药大学（哈尔滨 150040）
Author(s):
WANG Lingshu; LUO Xue; YANG Guang.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine（Harbin 150040）
关键词:
脂肪扫散; 常规埋线; 单纯性肥胖; 穴位; 临床疗效; 中西医结合
Keywords:
Key words Fat sweep method;  Acupoint thread embedding;  Simple obesity;  Acupoint; Clinical efficacy; Combine traditional Chinese and western medicine
分类号:
R723.14
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘 要 目的：观察穴位埋线联合脂肪扫散法治疗单纯性肥胖的临床疗效。方法：将60例脾虚湿阻型单纯性肥胖患者根据随机数字表分为穴位埋线联合脂肪扫散组和穴位埋线组，每组各30例。两组取穴相同，治疗组在对照组的基础上增加脂肪扫散，13 d埋线1次，持续治疗3次为1个疗程。分别观察两组患者治疗前后腰围、体质量指数（BMI）的变化情况，评价两组总有效率结果。结果：治疗后两组腰围均明显降低，且组内比较及组间比较均有统计学差异（P＜0.05）。两组组内BMI疗效明显低于治疗前（P＜0.05）,两组比较无统计学差异（P＞0.05）。总有效率为86.7％，对照组总有效率为83.3％，两组疗效比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：穴位埋线联合脂肪扫散法治疗腹围疗效优于常规埋线组，总有效率及BMI指数有明显效果且疗效相当。
Abstract:
Abstract Objective：To observe the clinical efficacy of acupoint thread embedding plus fat sweep method in treating simple obesity. Methods: 60 cases of simple obesity with spleen deficiency and dampness obstruction were randomly divided into acupoint catgut embedding combined with fat scanning powder group and acupoint embedding thread group with 30 cases in each group.The two groups took the same points,and the treatment group increased the fat dispersion method based on the control group.It was buried once in B days and lasted 3 times as one course in the treatment.Results: After treatment, the waist circumference of the two groups decreased significantly. There was significant difference in waist circumference between two groups（P＜0.05）.There was statistical difference between the two groups（P＜0.05）.BMI in group 2 was significantly lower than that before treatment（P＜0.05）.There was no statistical difference between the two groups（P＞0.05）.Total effective rates was 86.7％, total effective rates was 83.3％.There was no significant difference in curative effect between the two groups.Conclusion: Clinical observation of acupoint thread embedding plus fat sweep method treatment of abdominal circumference’s curative effect is better than the routine embedding group. The total effective rate and BMI index have obvious effect and the curative effect is equal.

参考文献/References:

[1] 闫利敏，刘志诚，袁锦虹，等.电针对胃肠腑热型单纯性成人脂肪细胞数是固定的，但细胞体积大小可以变化，传统的减肥只能改善脂肪体积而不会破坏细胞肥胖病患者内脏脂肪的作用[J] .中国针灸,2016,36(9):897900.
[2] 陆春霞，刘志诚，徐 斌.温针灸治疗女性痰湿内阻型肥胖并发高脂血症患者疗效分析[J] ．针灸临床杂志，2015，31(3)：2124．
[3] 英 姿，宣丽华.穴位埋线治疗单纯性肥胖的方法及作用概述[J] .山东中医药大学学报．2015,39(1):98100．
[4] 顾春英，袁冰峰.拨针局部减肥疗效观察及机理探讨[J] ．中国美容医学,2015,11(24):8788.
[5] 危北海，贾葆鹏.单纯性肥胖病的诊断及疗效评定标准[J] .中国中西医结合杂志，1998,18(5):317319.
[6] 蓝丹纯，许能贵，孙 健，等.电针结合埋线治疗腹型肥胖的随机对照研究[J] .广州中医药大学学报，2016，33 （2）：189193.
[7] 李春桂，曹柏龙，苗桂珍，等．健脾祛湿化痰降浊方为主治疗肥胖型糖尿病前期的临床观察[J] ．陕西中医，2016，37（８）：10211022.
[8] 梁翠梅，孙颂歌，胡 慧.不同疗程针刺治疗腹型肥胖疗效初探[J] .辽宁中医药大学学报,2018，20(8):170172.
[9] 黄 涛.腹部穴位埋线配合中药对中心肥胖型糖尿病血糖控制情况观察[J] .中国针灸，2017，37（12）：12871288.〖ZK)〗
[10] 李苗苗.穴位埋线法与电针疗法治疗脾虚湿阻型单纯性肥胖的临床研究\[D\].北京：北京中医药大学，2018：4344.
[11] 于菲菲，史丽萍，李 晓.穴位埋线治疗单纯性肥胖临床研究进展[J] ．陕西中医，2017，38 (12)：17911792.
[12] 王艳丽，赵喜新，郭现辉.透穴埋线治疗单纯性肥胖症1206例[J] .中医研究,2018，31(8):6061.
[13] 顾春英，袁冰峰.拨针局部减肥疗效观察及机理探讨[J] .中国美容医学,2015，10（3）8788.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-13