[1]吕静,尤路,万小雪,等.解语丹加减配合言语训练治疗中风后失语风痰瘀阻证临床观察[J].陕西中医,2019,(11):1531-1533.
　LV Jing,YOU Lu,WAN Xiaoxue,et al.Clinical observation on treatment of aphasia after apoplexy with Jieyudan plus minus speech training[J].,2019,(11):1531-1533.
点击复制

解语丹加减配合言语训练治疗中风后失语风痰瘀阻证临床观察
分享到：

《陕西中医》[ISSN:1000-7369/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年11期
页码:
1531-1533
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical observation on treatment of aphasia after apoplexy with Jieyudan plus minus speech training
文章编号:
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10007369.2019.11.012
作者:
吕静;  尤路; 万小雪;  贾建真△
西安中医脑病医院（西安 710032）
Author(s):
LV Jing; YOU Lu; WAN Xiaoxue; et al.
Xi’an Encephalopathy Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Xi’an 710032)
关键词:
中风后失语; 解语丹; 言语训练; 临床观察; ABC量表; BDAE量表
Keywords:
Key words Aphasia after stroke; Jieyudan; Speech training; Clinical observation; ABC standard; BDAE standard
分类号:
R255.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
摘要目的：研究并观察解语丹加减配合言语训练治疗中风后失语风痰瘀阻证的临床疗效。方法：选择100例中风后失语患者，随机分为两组，其中治疗组和对照组各50例，治疗组采用解语丹配合言语训练，对照组采用单一言语训练，疗程为2个月，两组治疗结束后通过观察汉语失语症评定量表（ABC量表）、BDAE分级评定量表以及有效率量表,进行分析临床疗效。结果：观察汉语失语症评定量表,治疗组临床疗效优于对照组（P＜005）。观察BDAE分级评定量表，治疗组语言改善的等级比对照组更高（P＜005）。两组治疗前后治疗组总有效率高于对照组（P＜005）。结论：解语丹加减配合言语训练治疗中风后失语效果明显，并且优于单纯康复治疗。
Abstract:
AbstractObjective：To study and observe the clinical effect of Jieyudan plus combined with speech training in the treatment of aphasia after stroke warm needling.Methods: Selected admission 100 patients with aphasia after stroke were randomly divided into two groups: 50 in the treatment group and 50 in the control group.The treatment group received traditional Chinese medicine and speech training,and the control group only received speech training for 2 months.Before and after treatment,the ABC standard、 BDAE standard and total efficiency were used to evaluate the changes in speech function,so as to analyze the curative effect.Results: To observe the Chinese aphasia scale,the curative effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group(P＜005).To observe the BDAE rating scale,we were able to find that the level of language improvement in the treatment group was higher than in the control group(P＜005),the difference was statistically significant.Both groups had higher efficiency than control group before and after treatment(P＜005).Results:The treatment of aphasia after apoplexy by speech training with Jieyudan is obviously superior to conventional treatment,and the curative effect of it was better than received speech training.

参考文献/References:

[1]姚婧,宋彦丽,李磊，等.性别、年龄、卒中类型与卒中后失语症类型的相关性分析[J].中国卒中杂志,2013,8(9):723728.
[2]乔玉，马继红，彭拥军.近10年针灸和重复经颅磁刺激治疗中风后失语研究进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报，2019，8（21）：3033.
[3]黄如训，梁秀龄.临床神经病学［M］. 北京:人民卫生出版社，1999:259261.
[4]杨清露，丘卫红．经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后失语症的研究进展[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志，2013，35(3):229231.
[5]周士枋,范振华.实用康复医学[M].南京:东南大学出版社，1998:352353.
[6]高素荣.失语症[M].北京：北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社，2006：434452.
[7]赵凯赫.醒脑开窍针法配合言语康复治疗中风后命名性 失语的临床研究[D].长春.长春中医药大学，2018：1920.
[8]王煜明,李爱萍,王浩.等.针刺配合语言训练治疗中风后失语症疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2011,27(11):1920.
[9]齐国豪,常宝燕,赵全忠.头皮针结合言语训练治疗中风后运动性失38例[J].光明中医,2017,32(2):256257.
[10]李种泰.解语丹结合针刺治疗中风失语疗效观察[J].辽宁中医药,2005,32(3):250.
[11]周慧君.天麻有效成分的药理作用与临床应用研究进展[J]．中医临床研究，2016，8(22）:5658.
[12]王睿，费洪新，李晓明． 石菖蒲的化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J].中华中医药学刊，2013，31(7):136 140.
[13]赵检英,石雕，谭茜，等．全蝎纯化液对实验性动脉血栓形成 tPA、PAI1 的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志，2012，10(2): 195196.
[14]朱利,苏同生.针刺治疗中风后失语症研究进展[J].陕西中医，2019，40(6):814.
[15]杨文海，宁显忠，赵德福,等.脑梗死患者血清五聚素3、甲壳质酶蛋白40和白细胞分化抗原36表达及检测临床意义[J].陕西医学杂志，2019，48(3):302.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-15